Give opposing positions to six AI models. They build their cases independently; Satcove compares the trade-offs and returns one practical verdict.
Start a FightStandard consensus asks: "What does each AI think?" — six positions, one synthesis. Fast and useful for mapping how the panel frames a question.
Cove Fight asks: "What is the strongest case on each side?" It assigns opposing positions, compares their assumptions and evidence, and asks an arbiter to resolve the trade-offs against your actual constraints.
The structured opposition is the feature. The final output names what the cases share, what remains unresolved, and what action best fits the constraints. Agreement describes alignment, not truth.
Each AI model analyzes your question in isolation — no influence from other models. Six genuinely different positions on the table.
Models are assigned pro and con positions and independently test assumptions, evidence, risks, and consequences.
Cove compares the cases, preserves material disagreement, and produces a final recommendation with a concrete next step.
Every Cove Fight ends with an agreement score — how aligned the models were after all three rounds.
Read the verdict first, then inspect the strongest objection and the assumptions that drive it. The agreement score tells you whether the model outputs aligned; it does not certify factual accuracy.
Use the proposed next step when it fits your constraints. For medical, legal, financial, or other high-stakes decisions, verify current facts and take the structured objections to a qualified expert.
Any question. Any position. Six AIs, three rounds, one verdict.
Start a FightLaunch with ⚔️ in the input bar, or select Fight mode in Cove.